RevAssembly Tool 01

Revenue Predictability Model

Compare the number your team is calling with what the pipeline evidence and your historical conversion actually support — then land on a range you would defend in a board meeting.

  1. 1Pick an example pipeline below, or edit any deal to match your own.
  2. 2Open a deal and check off the evidence your customer has actually confirmed.
  3. 3Set your win rates and slip rate, then read the recommended landing range.

Step 1 — Load an example pipeline

Enterprise-led motion, long cycles, a commit number carried by three large deals.

The recommendation

Where this model believes the quarter lands

$2.45Mto$2.53M
76% of commit is evidence-backed

Rep commit

$1.43M

Evidence-vetted

$1.09M

Win-rate baseline

$0.98M

Pipeline coverage

1.0×

Your team is committing $1.43M, your historical win rates support $0.98M, and the deals with confirmed customer evidence support $1.09M. $0.64M of that commit sits on deals that are single-threaded or missing core customer evidence (Northwind Logistics, Arcadia Health).

Including $1.45M already closed, the win-rate baseline lands at $2.43M — a $2.57M gap to the $5.00M target.

Step 2 — Deal evidence

Northwind Logistics

$640K · Commercial · Rep calls it Commit

Evidence confirmed

67%

Does not pass vetting
  • Stalled — 64d in stage vs 31d avg
  • Single-threaded — 2 contacts recorded
  • Unverified commit — missing decision timeline confirmed and economic buyer engaged

This deal is excluded from the evidence-vetted number because: no decision timeline confirmed, no economic buyer engaged, only 2 contacts.

Open pipeline

Click a deal to inspect it

8 deals

Northwind Logistics

New Logo · rep calls it Commit

Arcadia Health

New Logo · rep calls it Commit

Volta Manufacturing

Expansion · rep calls it Commit

Clear

Helios Retail Group

New Logo · rep calls it Best Case

Cobalt Financial

Expansion · rep calls it Best Case

Meridian Labs

New Logo · rep calls it Pipeline

Southport Utilities

New Logo · rep calls it Pipeline

Kestrel Software

Expansion · rep calls it Best Case

Step 3 — Your assumptions

What your team typically produces

These rates create the win-rate baseline. They are an input, not a forecast on their own — change them and every number above moves.

12%

Slip rate is the share of commit and best-case pipeline that historically pushes into a later quarter rather than closing lost. It is applied to every forecast line.

Round-up

The forecast call, written out

Working from 8 open opportunities worth $3.56M, with $1.45M already closed, this model expects the quarter to land between $2.45M and $2.53M — $2.57M short of the $5.00M target.

Your team is calling $1.43M in commit. Only $1.09M of that is backed by customer-verified evidence, so the call carries roughly 76% evidence support. The win-rate baseline on the same pipeline produces $0.98M, using 24% on new logo and 58% on expansion with a 12% slip rate applied.

$0.64M of commit is the disagreement: those deals are being called without a confirmed timeline or an engaged economic buyer. That is the number to inspect first this week.

What the model believes

  • Recommended landing range: $2.45M to $2.53M.
  • Rep commit $1.43M · evidence-vetted $1.09M · win-rate baseline $0.98M.
  • Pipeline coverage of the remaining target: 100%.
  • Best case adds $0.96M if the softer commitments hold.

Where the risk sits

  • 7 of 8 deals carry at least one risk flag (11 flags total).
  • Unverified commit: Northwind Logistics.
  • Single-threaded: Northwind Logistics, Helios Retail Group, Southport Utilities — two or fewer contacts recorded.
  • Stalled beyond 1.5x the 31-day stage average: Northwind Logistics, Helios Retail Group.

Assumptions this rests on

  • New logo win rate 24%, expansion 58%.
  • Average sales cycle 96 days; slip rate 12% applied to every forecast line.
  • A deal only counts as evidence-vetted with a confirmed timeline, an engaged economic buyer and three or more contacts.
  • No deal reached Commit unusually fast against your stated cycle.

What to do next

  • Inspect the 1 unverified commit deal before the next forecast call and either confirm evidence or move the category.
  • Close the $2.57M gap with pipeline you can still cycle inside 96 days, or set expectations now rather than at quarter end.
  • Multi-thread the single-threaded deals — add a second and third contact before they are called commit.
  • Report the range, not a single number, and show the evidence that moves the bottom of it.

This is a scenario model, not a prediction. Use it to expose assumptions and decide which deals deserve inspection this week.

Explore another model